Iraqi government spox offers two possible reasons why Israel did not strike Iraq

BAGHDAD — Iraqi government spokesperson Basim Al-Awadi on Wednesday outlined two possible reasons why Israel has not targeted Iraq. Speaking during an interview on Iraq’s state-run television, Al-Awadi credited the Iraqi government’s strategic policies as a key factor in avoiding attacks, while also suggesting that Israel might be reserving Iraq for future escalation.

“Efforts have been made to dismantle arenas and launch strikes on Yemen and Syria, but Iraq remains the only party that has not been targeted, thanks to the adopted strategy,” Al-Awadi said. However, he added, “It is highly possible that Iraq has been reserved for the final stages or the last days,” highlighting the potential for future risks.

In recent months, the Iraqi government has intensified efforts to shield the country from being drawn into the escalating regional conflict involving Israel. These measures include diplomatic initiatives aimed at curbing Iran-backed militias within Iraq, discouraging actions that could trigger Israeli retaliation. To support this effort, Iraq has sought cooperation from both Tehran and Washington to restrain militia activities.

Israel, meanwhile, has issued warnings perceived by Iraq as threats to extend its military operations into Iraqi territory, targeting Iran-backed militias accused of orchestrating attacks on Israeli and U. S. forces. Israeli officials have reportedly conveyed to the United Nations Security Council their intention to act in self-defense against these groups. In response, Iraqi authorities have condemned such statements, describing them as pretexts for expanding aggression in the region. They have also urged the international community to intervene and prevent further escalation.

Some excerpts of Al-Awadi’s interview with Al-Iraqiya:

There was a well-organized and politically motivated media campaign on social media aimed at inciting the Iraqi public against the government’s decision to deduct 1% from employees’ salaries.

This deduction is voluntary, not mandatory. Any Iraqi who does not wish to participate can notify their respective department between December 1 and December 20.

The salaries of Iraqi state employees and retirees are constitutionally and legally protected, and no one in the state has access to them. The current process is entirely voluntary and non-obligatory.

With the ceasefire in Lebanon, we have concluded the easier part; the battle has ended, but the war has not. The more difficult stage involves navigating unclear plans. Iraq remains in a “buffer zone,” but a rational and balanced policy has managed to spare us significant harm.

َAnchor’s question: What would Iraq’s position be in the event of an attack?

Up until a few days ago, the equations worked on by the prime minister were yielding positive results. However, no one can predict the intentions of Netanyahu’s government, the developments with the new U.S. administration, or how Netanyahu will act in the future.

Efforts have been made to dismantle arenas and launch strikes on Yemen and Syria, but Iraq remains the only party that has not been targeted, thanks to the adopted strategy. Nevertheless, it is highly possible that Iraq has been reserved for the final stages or the last days. This is a realistic scenario, and the Iraqi government is addressing it through diplomatic channels.

Part of the Prime Minister’s visit to Spain was to discuss with Europe the development of a specific strategy and how they could support Iraq through their influence and relationships with major powers, aiming to shield Iraq from potential harm.

If the Iraqi government is formally notified of an impending attack, it will take the necessary measures.